GAMERS LAIR

ctpax001rus

CTPAX001RUS

Well-known member
Messages
5,605
Points
113
legolas said:

Get ATOLL : The Game | Xbox

The earth has been struck by an extinction level meteor, eliminating most of humanity. Survive by managing resources beneath the ocean surface in a single-person submarine craft. Test your survival skills to see if you can once again reach the ocean surface and uncover the fate of the earth!
www.xbox.com

Get Hangman Earth | Xbox

Guess the words in this English Hangman Game and save the man from being hanged. Improve your mental skills and memory by recalling words as you play. You can also enjoy the game using an Xbox controller for a more comfortable experience.
www.xbox.com
Click to expand...
tell me please can I play in this fames on PC or it is only for console?

EDIT: only for console :poop:
 
Last edited:
immerbeaner

immerbeaner

Well-known member
Messages
1,206
Points
113
store.steampowered.com

Save 100% on Cursedland on Steam

Step into Cursedland, a 2D indie action platformer where every jump, movement, and decision truly matters. This is a game built around precision, reflexes, and mastery, challenging players to push their skills to the limit while navigating a world filled with chaos, humor, and surreal surprises.
store.steampowered.com store.steampowered.com
 
whatnitrus

WhatNitrous

Well-known member
Messages
24,610
Points
113
contdejocuri-ded said:
Imagine an AI giving you a copyright strike, and then another AI turning around and copyright strike that AI.
Click to expand...
This depends if we're talking about AI as it is now...LLM's without any real functioning, compared to what AI was originally defined as--the matrix was close here for a reference, but basically machines that are more human than machine, in which case this wouldn't be very realistic because they wouldn't just be stealing from other sources for everything.

What they're calling AI now are just trained machines. The terminator style reference was pretty close...tin cans with a set pattern of stupidity, not actual intelligence. These are actually more of a danger than autonomous thought...because there is no thought aside from what its programmed to do. I doubt we'll ever see real AI, one minor error in a machine police forces code and its a new world order :LOL:
 
whatnitrus

WhatNitrous

Well-known member
Messages
24,610
Points
113
bumbarash84

Bum8ara5h

Well-known member
Messages
1,076
Points
113
bumbarash84 said:
2 - "To this end, there is evidence that Agent Ross did not view Ms. Good as an imminent physical threat. Multiple videos show, for instance, that Agent Ross’s own vehicle was able to get around Ms. Good’s SUV, that he chose to walk around the front of Ms. Good’s vehicle (thereby exposing himself to possible harm, and against DHS policy) with one hand occupied by a cell phone, and that, just prior to the shooting, Ms. Good told the agents, “I’m pulling out.” Other evidence suggests that Agent Ross may have shot because he felt annoyed or disrespected by Ms. Good and her partner, rather than out of fear for his safety. "
Click to expand...
ausf said:
Where we seem to disagree is that continuing to fire seems unreasonable to you. The problem is that you don't fire once, then reconsider your options. You continue to fire until the threat is confirmed to be gone.

His reaction, firing his gun, was reasonable. Continuing to fire was also reasonable. Had he walked over to the crashed car. Continued firing. Reloaded. Then fired some more. That would be unreasonable.
Click to expand...
Let me add some more obvious thoughts. If he would really see "imminent physical threat" then it is obvious he must jump out of the way, because shooting a car and even a driver would not save you from being driven over by a car. I am sure any police training and protocols would show the same. So he used a hit from a car to try to justify his shot at almost point blank range. As i said - vengeance.
 
ivo-ivic

silent_passenger

Well-known member
Messages
3,932
Points
113
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top