GAMERS LAIR

ivo-ivic

silent_passenger

Well-known member
Messages
3,691
Points
113
 
whatnitrus

WhatNitrous

Well-known member
Messages
23,437
Points
113
ausf said:
They likely got hungry before they could burn any more, and had to stop. The charges include mischief endangering life, and mischief over $5k. In Canada, mischief is a crime.
Click to expand...
I thought I was brutal :ROFLMAO:

So mischief in canada is like destruction of property here I assume...or arsen lol.

They tried to charge me for involuntary manslaughter once for shooting a house with a BB gun (pussy ass handgun mind you), I beat the charge because as a drunk I had shot myself in the temple with the same gun--so when they brought those ridiculous charges.I offered to do it again..in the courtroom.

Judge didn't even know what to say to that :LOL:
 
Last edited:
ausf

Ausf

Well-known member
Messages
1,632
Points
113
www.bbc.com

Victorian Strangeness: The lawyer who shot himself proving his case

Author Jeremy Clay tells the strange story of the 19th Century lawyer who accidentally shot himself while demonstrating the innocence of a defendant in a murder trial.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com

In 1871 a man was shot, and there was some confusion about who shot him. The man that was charged was found not guilty after his lawyer drew the victim's gun in court, shooting himself in the process, and later dying. A second man later attempted the same stunt, also shooting himself, and also dying. The acquitted man was of course shot some time later, in an unrelated incident. 'Merica!
 
whatnitrus

WhatNitrous

Well-known member
Messages
23,437
Points
113
ausf said:
www.bbc.com

Victorian Strangeness: The lawyer who shot himself proving his case

Author Jeremy Clay tells the strange story of the 19th Century lawyer who accidentally shot himself while demonstrating the innocence of a defendant in a murder trial.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com

In 1871 a man was shot, and there was some confusion about who shot him. The man that was charged was found not guilty after his lawyer drew the victim's gun in court, shooting himself in the process, and later dying. A second man later attempted the same stunt, also shooting himself, and also dying. The acquitted man was of course shot some time later, in an unrelated incident. 'Merica!
Click to expand...
I like the end...they don't like to be caught in a lie in a small matter of that kind 😅

Talk about stupidity...I mean I've shot myself in my foot after sticking it in my mouth a few times...probably just today alone lmao...but damn. Twice. Dead. Thats some shit.
 
ausf

Ausf

Well-known member
Messages
1,632
Points
113
Speaking of guns and court cases. I watched Rust the other day, well I started. It was so boring I didn't get very far into it. Anyway, there seemed to be some confusion on whether the gun could fire without touching the trigger. Initial tests showed it could not, however later tests showed that when all chambers were loaded, it was possible for it to fire without touching the trigger.

Also, no one seems to put any blame on the woman that got shot. No ballistic shield. As the cinematographer, she was likely examining the (video) shot and wanted to see what it would look like as Baldwin pointed the gun at the camera. Of course the trial never got that far, but it seemed odd to me that everyone blamed Baldwin for pointing it at her, but no one blamed her for intentionally looking down the barrel.
 
whatnitrus

WhatNitrous

Well-known member
Messages
23,437
Points
113
ausf said:
Speaking of guns and court cases. I watched Rust the other day, well I started. It was so boring I didn't get very far into it. Anyway, there seemed to be some confusion on whether the gun could fire without touching the trigger. Initial tests showed it could not, however later tests showed that when all chambers were loaded, it was possible for it to fire without touching the trigger.

Also, no one seems to put any blame on the woman that got shot. No ballistic shield. As the cinematographer, she was likely examining the (video) shot and wanted to see what it would look like as Baldwin pointed the gun at the camera. Of course the trial never got that far, but it seemed odd to me that everyone blamed Baldwin for pointing it at her, but no one blamed her for intentionally looking down the barrel.
Click to expand...
I've never seen it, but it reminds me of the old film where a gun had a habit of firing back at the shooter and of course in one desperate situatuon fired properly and killed the baddie...that just keeps coming to mind talking about all these accidental shootings...mind you i've fired a few guns, loaded and dry. Its pretty hard to fucking shoot yourself unless your a retard as long as your aware of the possibility and the weapon itself and its not in a stack of junk just sitting there hidden. This is why i'm a fan of glocks, double safety for stupidity, one behind the trigger and in front. You can spin them on your fingers without concern--although I wouldnt suggest doing it regardless.

Bottom line, you shouldnt have a gun unless you intend to shoot it at...something, and you shouldnt have a gun if your a monon lol.

I prefer the person with a gun and the intention to kill that knows it over the fool with no idea what to do with it honestly. At least the killer has a target in mind :LOL:
 
Last edited:
ausf

Ausf

Well-known member
Messages
1,632
Points
113
whatnitrus said:
Its pretty hard to fucking shoot yourself unless your a retard
Click to expand...
In both Rust's case, a replica, and the 1871 gun, they weren't made with safety in mind. The three people in the 1871 case that shot themselves did so while drawing the gun from their side, presumably hidden by a jacket. Not sure exactly how, since no video, but it likely caught on something and they shot themselves in the torso.

Even recently though, some fire when dropped. Obviously this is a major safety issue. Some are also just poorly designed and constantly jam. I'm talking about guns made post 2000.
whatnitrus said:
At least the killer has a target in mind :LOL:
Click to expand...

Loading…

www.baltimorepolice.org
1747024845242.png
Unclear who this guy's target was. Look at his eyes.
 
whatnitrus

WhatNitrous

Well-known member
Messages
23,437
Points
113
ausf said:
Unclear who this guy's target was. Look at his eyes.
Click to expand...
I was.looking before I read that :LOL: if I looked like that my target would likely be myself before the O.D. kicked in :ROFLMAO:

Actually he might just be fucked up, thats not (all) drugs....his face is swollen...likely from the arrest.

Had that happen too and all I did was piss in a holding cell (i asked first--alot) cops fucked me up...royally. (on top of eating concrete--they did it in my own piss lol)
 
Last edited:
whatnitrus

WhatNitrous

Well-known member
Messages
23,437
Points
113
ausf said:
In both Rust's case, a replica, and the 1871 gun, they weren't made with safety in mind. The three people in the 1871 case that shot themselves did so while drawing the gun from their side, presumably hidden by a jacket. Not sure exactly how, since no video, but it likely caught on something and they shot themselves in the torso.
Click to expand...
Yeah you could tell by the gun it was an old western, but still...the second guy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top