"The primary problem is that while the answers that ChatGPT produces have a high rate of being incorrect, they typically look like they might be good and the answers are very easy to produce," says Stack Overflow moderators in a post. Critics argue that these tools are just very good at putting words into an order that makes sense from a statistical point of view, but they cannot understand the meaning or know whether the statements it makes are correct."
I'm a member at stack overflow...among many coding and hardware forums.
Anyways, they made my point pretty well for me....which was fortunate since my response got erased doing some further reading from your link (purely out of curiosity what brought this idea up if anything)
To answer you in a short way myself, from what they said above and the fact you have to be signed into OpenAI and have a chat with an offline (while online lol) autobot, seems way too overkill for the task at hand.
I sincerely doubt Benny boi reads every one of the thousand responses they must get, even after keys run out....and even if they did you could likely rip a false one from others users previous posts or just make a randomized bot yourself based specifically on writing game blah blahs of 200 words (as if thats alot, I could type 6 by hand if I didn't give a shit after watching a youtube video lol) by researching others answers or simply using a review site.
Either way...massive overkill for something so simple I could do myself, although it might work great...I might even go try it for a laugh since i wanna check out el-bato anyways
Bottom line is making something like that is probably one of the easiest automation/random programs ever since you'd likely be using a robot to trick a robot to give you the key...and since ChatGPT was trained by human responses itself, it would likely reproduce the same answer every time you asked it the same question.
Ever wonder how they caught onto the essays?