It's not about JUST war crimes. It's about dicatrorship, it's about censorship, it's about far right politics, it's about genocide. Russia did and still does all of this, not just "war crimes".
And yet, instead of giving your definition, you wrote a bunch of empty words. Hypocrite.
No, it isn't just about war crimes but I won't write an essay. It's about too many things which though aren't Nazism..
I'm not giving my definition because this is ridiculous. And if you don't know what Nazis represent, don't use the term.
We have a fundamental difference.. Whatever I wrote can be verified by a thinking individual in a few minutes max. Meanwhile your claims and similarities or however you wanna call it can't ve backed up. Let alone the "common one"
or example, there was a study book where there was stated that ukrainians has the genes of traitors.
mzfkng TRAITOR GENES, Carl!!
Can't google it right now though, but I've heard it from someone who was studying at that time (I'm not that old, so I couldn't heard such things by myself, you know).
Also...have you heard about golodomor...?
Because this is a baeic skill in my studies, you need to cross check references and who wrote what and why. Government books for example depending on who rules may try to present something in another light or even change history. There is a reason why only SOME books are considered reputable sources..
But I don't have the will or energy to copy-paste an entire book.........
I'm bad with names. I may remember the situation and not the name
already done that, you even quoted my answer on those.
First you were saying that russia not equal nazi 'cause no one trying to kill every ukrainian.
But after you've been told by Hvost about they actually stated otherwise in their own media, you still don't call them nazi.
I can clearly see a contradiction here. What about you?
I already answered that and it isn't contradicting. It's not about the fact that X is Ukrainian. He doesn't care for Ukrainians in Africa or the US. He doesn't care to kill (although he probably would) all Ukrainians. He wants to take over the country and it happens to be Ukraine. He didn't go searching the world for gays, Jews, black people and kill them blindly solely based on such factors. If you can't see this difference then I can't do something more..
they still can be called Nazi, just like the fallen building can be called fallen building no matter the cause, you know.
No. It lacks the "fundamental difference". A fallen building is rocks on the ground. A nazi isn't EVERY "dictator" that waged war and killed everyone in sight to conquer them.
Again.. The issue is the term. Everything else, I'm not commenting on
her comments contradicting each other
her to blame
I'm sick of it myself, believe it or not...((
Nope.. You just don't understand what I'm saying
Also still no reaction on those parts...
Because it's unnecessary from the rest. If you insist, yes, I wouldn't have an issue with it
Same thing Muslims say. Are all Muslims suddenly Nazis because the Koran speaks of holy war and heaven?..

Edit: (which isn't even really true as a statement but toooo many subjects for 1 day)