BlueBerserkPrince
Member
- Messages
- 175
- Points
- 18
every single one of these has been for a beta key.
...aaaand he just re-ran the same giveawayOriginally posted by: chstwnd said:
every single one of these has been for a beta key.
How do you know these are all the same guy? .. You are allowed one per your steam account. That is the only rule i know so far But feel free to email support and see what they tell you.Originally posted by: LambdaGenerator said:Anything against multis?
if you read that right that guy has a minimum of 70 Accounts.
because it was a mistake, this should only be a cautionary note to people who take part in the giveaway. it was originally a giveaway on another site, though, so that would potentially disqualify it, but then again, it was mistakenly given away, so maybe it should still be a valid GA itemOriginally posted by: M F said:Fractured Lands giveaways are temporary keys. They're free keys which also disqualifies current giveaways.
The following reddit post explains.
https://www.reddit.com/r/FreeGamesOnSteam/comments/9vcjfp/_/e9c8h8f t
The problem with DLC is that you need to own the base game to redeem (still true?). DLC for free to play games are fine. Anyone who wins can confirm if they're valid.EDIT: Looks suspicious like someone found a high value dlc...
But this DLC doesn't match the description. In the description there is silver pack, which could be bought for 0,99$ hereOriginally posted by: M F said:The problem with DLC is that you need to own the base game to redeem (still true?). DLC for free to play games are fine. Anyone who wins can confirm if they're valid.EDIT: Looks suspicious like someone found a high value dlc...
I wasn't meaning to comment about the cheating (conflicting description). I was pointing out that anyone could try the giveaway and confirm the degree of cheating. I highly doubt it but it's possible at least one of them could have been better than the master booster pack due to it offering 1,000,000 credits and the master offering 500,000. Description space is limited and the giver could have been cut off.Originally posted by: lewriczin said:So yeah, it's obvious and blatant cheating
Originally posted by: lewriczin said:So yeah, it's obvious and blatant cheating
I wasn't meaning to comment about the cheating (conflicting description). I was pointing out that anyone could try the giveaway and confirm the degree of cheating. I highly doubt it but it's possible at least one of them could have been better than the master booster pack due to it offering 1,000,000 credits and the master offering 500,000. Description space is limited and the giver could have been cut off.
When i close a giveaway they don't disappear. they just "end early" without a winner being annonced .. so if it says " Expired" and doesn't have a winner .. odds are I closed itI prevously asked if a giveaway contained a better key than what was linked to, is that a bad giveaway. No one cared. Again, I doubt these giveaways fall under that.
A word - believe me or not, I'm usually still giving such cases benefit of the doubtSome people are not meaning to "cheat" they just couldn't find the link for their stuff (usually because it is banned) and so they use a dif link and change the descript. Thus why i wish It would auto message them.